It is taken 21.12.08  from http://images.google.com.tr/imgres?imgurl=http://www.yeniduzengazetesi.com/articlefiles/398-ozgurluk.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.yeniduzengazetesi.com/haber_detay2.asp%3Fa%3D398&usg=__B8LAZVO8wujnZHy3GhbowF3NzT4=&h=186&w=250&sz=21&hl=tr&start=4&um=1&tbnid=D9FfXwuozAeWIM:&tbnh=83&tbnw=111&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmedya%2Bba%25C4%259F%25C4%25B1ms%25C4%25B1zl%25C4%25B1%25C4%259F%25C4%25B1%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dtr%26sa%3DG

I don’t see any difference between Turkish and International media. Most of mass media tools are controlled by some big companies in respect to their economic profits. Their economic benefits have close relation with people’s concern about these companies. Around the world, media tycoons acknowledge about importance of reliance on their companies. For this reason, they know that media is most useful tool to attract people’s interest. For example, in Turkey some conservative groups support some media companies with their financial contribution and they carry on to support regularly through some unbroken relation chains. In this way, they effort to expand their politic powers by way of buying new media companies and so they become more powerful than before. In this case, political views change through in one direction because of big companies expectations from media tools. So, media broadcast according to profits of owner company and media foundation become untrusty. Same situation is acceptable for international media. In current case, companies tend to become more collective in respect of pass. Small companies are purchasing by big ones and freedom of thought are restricted by powerful ones. If capitalist economies continue to redound the rate of big companies political condensation I think political situation is going to be worse than present conditions.